From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-fixes tree
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:48:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <305e3cdc-3ffe-91d3-1034-4b7395e301d9@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210625200520.7e44f38e@canb.auug.org.au>
On 6/25/21 4:05 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the kunit-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:9:
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_single_hop_walk':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:455:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 455 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:455:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 455 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:466:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 466 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:466:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 466 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_daisy_chain_walk':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:512:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 512 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:512:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 512 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:523:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 523 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:523:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 523 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_simple_tree_walk':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:573:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 573 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:573:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 573 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:584:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 584 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:584:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 584 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_complex_tree_walk':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:655:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 655 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:655:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 655 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:666:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 666 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:666:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 666 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_max_length_walk':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:756:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 756 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:756:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 756 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:767:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 767 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:767:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 767 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane0':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:850:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 850 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:850:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 850 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:853:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 853 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:853:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 853 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane1':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:910:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 910 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:910:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 910 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:913:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 913 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:913:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 913 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane1_chain':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:988:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 988 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:988:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 988 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:991:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 991 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:991:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 991 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane1_chain_reverse':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1066:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 1066 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1066:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 1066 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1069:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 1069 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1069:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 1069 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_mixed_chain':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1156:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 1156 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1156:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 1156 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1159:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 1159 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1159:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 1159 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_mixed_chain_reverse':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1246:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 1246 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1246:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 1246 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1249:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 1249 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1249:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 1249 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 8f0877c26e4b ("thunderbolt: test: Remove some casts which are no longer required")
>
I am applying them now. Okay to add your Aked-by Brendan?
thanks,
-- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-25 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-25 10:05 linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-25 11:31 ` David Gow
2021-06-25 15:48 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-05 23:18 Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-06 2:06 ` David Gow
2024-08-06 19:20 ` Shuah Khan
2024-08-06 22:29 ` Shuah Khan
2021-06-25 9:52 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-25 17:53 ` Daniel Latypov
2021-06-25 18:12 ` Shuah Khan
2021-06-25 18:46 ` Brendan Higgins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=305e3cdc-3ffe-91d3-1034-4b7395e301d9@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox