From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:03:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32647147.KmAPzBrbMT@sifl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1474416.aEfMv8Ny53@sifl>
On Friday, June 20, 2014 12:06:28 PM Paul Moore wrote:
{big snip}
> Stephen, assuming for a moment that I created a fresh branch, based against
> 3.15, and then added the SELinux patches for 3.16 (basically the few new
> patches that were in the ole #next branch) would that serve as a reasonable
> basis for a new SELinux #next branch? Around the -rc5/6/7 timeframe I would
> send a pull request to James to pull from this next branch into the Linux
> Security branch for 3.17. Once 3.16 is released, I would merge that into
> this new #next branch and continue with the next round of patches.
>
> FYI, more or less, the above is the process we've settled upon for all of
> the trees that get accumulated into the Linux Security tree.
Hi Stephen,
Does the above work for you in linux-next? I'd like to try and resolve this
sooner rather than later and I imagine you feel the same ...
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-24 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-17 22:40 linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up Stephen Rothwell
2014-06-18 18:26 ` Paul Moore
2014-06-19 15:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-06-19 19:47 ` Paul Moore
2014-06-19 22:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-06-20 3:43 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2014-06-20 3:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-06-20 14:57 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2014-06-20 16:06 ` Paul Moore
2014-06-24 18:03 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2014-06-24 23:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-06-25 10:51 ` James Morris
2014-06-25 22:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-06-27 2:41 ` James Morris
2014-06-25 14:14 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32647147.KmAPzBrbMT@sifl \
--to=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).