From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E1A735966; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 09:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738574516; cv=none; b=MxlCne+lnX0S8tzVCw7WDteSb6dn2T9Nug0yH6k7S8l+SHcILeIlNT5Crj2hzsS+2oPbFktRnQ7em34bq5+M836TdbzrJz0BuXAe0DnCooc02JAC1/C0QdRCuSjd/QmF5y+VPcAidXhHBcn+v9847+GtHTMsK8JQ9Crm+jNSl6s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738574516; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KNqKEeCDHiGL7pdfu/w4wP8bp23/cWumUhFQarKaWmg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PjNzuwifspV0ZlYDGcq4hXQKGaIJT4jbMJqpIPJO69ZsFL7xt3WNjjLSDMJIYIKl0xtg3s9eSWMX2Kq13gVY1vlM/KBUYyWXZfrrHRkcD+mcWRv7uStg+daBmUy4YxDfevEDQ6M8G6Q5Z+3zI9DmDVAZMHxiIzmYTxAOGfM24c8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b=bWGY/UM/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b="bWGY/UM/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=h7DSJ574upxaEZnY0esT4/q/9aBrG8kbT8CGi3ihZqs=; b=bWGY/UM/1SMPzr8tDGZFGwaoXo boDNqb/nPWDznFoUNcanSmNIuEMeHvpOmxKJuiMwSXkuX6YWVh1+XT1exOOL7/MCJCmG1GpCl9GAF c2TRf8uPG4ufFTcQ4WzxdMdW4EhiDqbNIhaetb068Ux4+TUOAOqCPSiUwos3LbSDmHoeP0qvozlSU EihJ0sFEH/0qNGh25sx5CIVYB798kYPDBb4uObHIxDE5xYGHV30AVQoh1dvvJbFgoZpgzz82Ni8e2 3Zd7rEPkJ6Ehah9NmyoBO7EZfoDKxFFfsgPy5IRJ4yXMKmn7J85+k5ZikMJeFL8OJ1GsMxe5HFGnK pUGwLuMQ==; Received: from i53875b5c.versanet.de ([83.135.91.92] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1teseN-0006Lx-9C; Mon, 03 Feb 2025 10:21:51 +0100 From: Heiko =?UTF-8?B?U3TDvGJuZXI=?= To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Lukasz Czechowski , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the rockchip tree Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 10:21:50 +0100 Message-ID: <3359983.44csPzL39Z@diego> In-Reply-To: <20250203193313.0740304d@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20250203193313.0740304d@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi Stephen, Am Montag, 3. Februar 2025, 09:33:13 MEZ schrieb Stephen Rothwell: > Hi all, >=20 > In commit >=20 > 11534d3c53d5 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable DMA for uart5 on px30-ring= neck") >=20 > Fixes tag >=20 > Fixes: thanks for noticing and should be fixed now. It seems b4 smuggled that in from a _previous_ review iteration of the series, where the fixes tag was suggested and explained: =E2=9C=97 [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Move uart5 pin configurati= on to SoM dtsi =E2=9C=97 [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable DMA for uart5 on p= x30-ringneck + Fixes: (=E2=9C=93 DKIM/cherry.de) The commit of course already had a proper fixes tag.