From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:12:55 +0100 Message-ID: <3580741.9uNSi7V1RO@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <20130110112836.19126ca740c8e13a15860dc0@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:36757 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753551Ab3AJNHK (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:07:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130110112836.19126ca740c8e13a15860dc0@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu , Bjorn Helgaas Hi, On Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:28:36 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c between commit 3c449ed00759 ("PCI/ACPI: Reserve > firmware-allocated resources for hot-added root buses") from the pci tree > and commit 47525cda88f5 ("ACPI / PCI: Fold acpi_pci_root_start() into > acpi_pci_root_add()") from the pm tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). Thanks for the fixup and please carry it for now (the conflict should go away when Bjorn pulls from my acpi-scan branch). Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.