From: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v9fs tree
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 21:40:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3823616.UlgstfPZBx@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46397336.ChKRcxMYMu@silver>
On Monday, December 5, 2022 3:31:57 PM CET Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Monday, December 5, 2022 5:10:18 AM CET Dominique Martinet wrote:
> > Stephen Rothwell wrote on Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 03:03:16PM +1100:
> > > After merging the v9fs tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
>
> > > failed like this:
> [...]
>
> > > net/9p/client.c:523:17: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_err'
> > >
> > > 523 | pr_err(
> > >
> > > | ^~~~~~
> > >
> > > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > > 36cd2f80abf8 ("net/9p: fix response size check in p9_check_errors()")
> > >
> > > I have applied the following patch for today:
> > Thank you!
> > I guess I should start building one 32bit kernel somewhere...
> :
> :/ I'll setup a 32-bit build system as well, sorry!
Dominique, looking at your 9p queue, I just realized what happened here: I
posted a v2 of these two patches, which got lost for some reason:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1669144861.git.linux_oss@crudebyte.com/
The currently queued 1st patch is still v1 as well.
Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-05 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-05 4:03 linux-next: build failure after merge of the v9fs tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-12-05 4:10 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-12-05 4:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-12-05 14:31 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-12-05 20:40 ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2022-12-05 22:41 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-12-08 15:55 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-12-08 23:53 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-12-09 14:40 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-12-09 21:24 ` Dominique Martinet
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-07-13 1:02 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-13 1:06 ` Dominique Martinet
2011-12-01 1:02 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-01 16:57 ` Joe Perches
2011-02-22 0:53 Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-22 5:20 ` Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-22 5:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-22 6:22 ` Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-22 14:57 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2011-02-22 16:48 ` Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3823616.UlgstfPZBx@silver \
--to=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).