From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephan Mueller Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] DRBG: Fix format string for debugging statements Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 02:15:46 +0200 Message-ID: <3976291.2Ne0xJphcZ@myon.chronox.de> References: <4927386.WYHrRe3NJm@myon.chronox.de> <3856718.HehN4Xqlpl@myon.chronox.de> <1404518973.6384.30.camel@joe-AO725> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1404518973.6384.30.camel@joe-AO725> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Cc: Dan Carpenter , Stephen Rothwell , Herbert Xu , kbuild test robot , kbuild@01.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2014, 17:09:33 schrieb Joe Perches: Hi Joe, > On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 01:57 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote: > > And I also get the same output. Yet I am not sure how that code can be > > compared to the code in the kernel. > > What that code shows is that the ARRAY_SIZE > type is size_t. > > The difference is ARRAY_SIZE in the kernel > should be output with %zu. Using %zu works without a warning on my 64 bit machine. So you are saying that ARRAY_SIZE will always be size_t on every architecture? If yes, I will update my patch. -- Ciao Stephan