Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the block tree

[Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>]

On 12/21/23 5:29 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 08:11:34PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 12/20/23 7:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The following commits are also in the vfs-brauner tree as different
>>> commits (but the same patches):
>>>
>>>   24fa3ae9467f ("file: remove pointless wrapper")
>>>   253ca8678d30 ("Improve __fget_files_rcu() code generation (and thus __fget_light())")
>>>   372a34e66fb7 ("fs: replace f_rcuhead with f_task_work")
>>>   4e94ddfe2aab ("file: remove __receive_fd()")
>>>   7cb537b6f6d7 ("file: massage cleanup of files that failed to open")
>>>   a88c955fcfb4 ("file: s/close_fd_get_file()/file_close_fd()/g")
>>>   eac9189c9619 ("file: stop exposing receive_fd_user()")
>>
>> Hmm confused, assumed vfs.file got rebased again, but doesn't look to be
>> the case. Christian?
> 
> Nope, vfs.file definitely didn't get rebased. That was just me being
> stupid and not merging vfs.file cleanly into vfs.all. Sorry about this.
> Fixed now.

OK good, thanks!

-- 
Jens Axboe