From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 13 (XEN) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:40:57 -0700 Message-ID: <4856CFD9.2060301@goop.org> References: <20080613232214.394fd6fd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080613101316.1c228fe7.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <4852F1C8.7060904@goop.org> <20080614203109.GH20851@kernel.dk> <4854B284.7030709@goop.org> <20080616193057.GA20851@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:55797 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751772AbYFPUlk (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:41:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080616193057.GA20851@kernel.dk> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jens Axboe Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , chrisw@sous-sol.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Jens Axboe wrote: > Thanks, I just folded it in with the existing patch to avoid breakage. > That one doesn't have an ack from you though, so if you have done a full > review of the x86 bits, I'd appreciate an ack on those from you :-) > I've been testing it without problems, at least under Xen. Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge J