linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2)
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:01:15 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4861A6EB.6050806@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080625003751.GP29319@disturbed>

Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:18:09PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> XFS shows 2 build problems today.
>>
>> 1. xfs_stats.h problem
>>
>>   CC      fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.o
>> In file included from /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:91,
>>                  from /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/xfs.h:44,
>>                  from /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c:18:
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.h: In function 'xfs_init_procfs':
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.h:150: error: expected ';' before '}' token
>> make[3]: *** [fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.o] Error 1
> 
> This will be a !CONFIG_PROC_FS change.
> 
> Lachlan/Niv - This is the guilty party:
> 
> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/xfs-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e0fe783155e4f1c7106f3579c258b9f995330c19
> 
> The commit log is:
> 
> [XFS]
>  
>  SGI-PV: 111111
>  SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31210a
>  
>  Signed-off-by: Niv Sardi <xaiki@sgi.com>
>  Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
> ---
> 
> What the hell happened here? Where's the commit title, description
> so this can be tracked back to a real patch?  That PV# is also bogus....
> 
> I suspect that it is this patch:
> 
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00322.html
> 
> Which means that the Signed-Off-By list is incorrect as well as the original
> patch came from Christoph. This can't go to mainline like this - the commit log
> needs to be fixed up.

We knew this checkin was stuffed up and I was planning to fix it in the for-linus
branch before pushing to mainline.  The merge tools had kittens when it came across
it too.  I think we need to rip it out of ptools and re-checkin it in with the
correct details.

> 
>> 2. ACL's undefined
>>
>>   CC      fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.o
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.c: In function 'xfs_decode_acl':
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.c:40: error: '_ACL_TYPE_ACCESS' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.c:40: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.c:40: error: for each function it appears in.)
>> /local/linsrc/linux-next-20080624/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.c:42: error: '_ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> make[3]: *** [fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_xattr.o] Error 1
> 
> And this will be a !CONFIG_XFS_POSIX_ACL build, I think.
> 
> Christoph - this is part of your change to use the generic ACL stuff,
> can you have a look?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-25  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-24  7:56 linux-next: Tree for June 24 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-24 11:51 ` [BUG] linux-next: Tree for June 24 - kernel panic at tg3_reset_hw() on x86_64 Kamalesh Babulal
     [not found] ` <20080624175612.cdf29651.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2008-06-24 17:53   ` [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 24 - missing files in drivers/media/dvb/ Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-25  3:28     ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-25  3:48       ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-29 11:43         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-06-29 12:35           ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-25  3:31     ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-25  0:18 ` linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2) Randy Dunlap
2008-06-25  0:37   ` [xfs-masters] " Dave Chinner
2008-06-25  1:31     ` Timothy Shimmin
2008-06-25  1:52       ` Timothy Shimmin
2008-06-26  8:17         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-27  7:26         ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-25  2:01     ` Lachlan McIlroy [this message]
2008-06-25  3:43       ` Dave Chinner
2008-06-27 13:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-16  7:19       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-17  5:26         ` Timothy Shimmin
2008-07-17  8:28           ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-27 13:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-25  0:24 ` linux-next: Tree for June 24 (ivtv) Randy Dunlap
2008-06-25  6:05   ` Hans Verkuil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4861A6EB.6050806@sgi.com \
    --to=lachlan@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).