From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timothy Shimmin Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:26:10 +1000 Message-ID: <487ED7F2.3040505@sgi.com> References: <20080624175612.cdf29651.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080624171809.42bbdf68.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20080625003751.GP29319@disturbed> <20080627132317.GB23854@lst.de> <20080716071922.GA16777@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:49819 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750954AbYGQF0Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:26:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080716071922.GA16777@lst.de> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 03:23:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> The tree is still messed up. This original [XFS] commit is still there, >> but also a revert of it. but no patch with the actual changes again (?) >> >> Also my patch to switch to the generic xattr code is attributed to >> Lachlan and appears twice in the commit list. I think this whole git >> tree needs to be regenerated. > > Could this please get fixed before the 2.6.27 pull? The xfs.git tree > now has Linus' latest changes pulled but this still doesn't look > fixed up. Yep, I believe Lachlan is planning to regenerate the xfs git tree before the pull request. --Tim