From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hiroshi Shimamoto Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 11 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:39:08 -0700 Message-ID: <48A1CABC.5010407@ct.jp.nec.com> References: <20080811164617.7b06df12.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <48A09CE5.70402@ct.jp.nec.com> <20080812153851.179fc90d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.158]:2816 "EHLO gateway-1237.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751267AbYHLRjN (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:39:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080812153851.179fc90d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Alan Cox , Jeff Dike Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Hiroshi, > > On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:11:17 -0700 Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: >> I got an error on um defconfig; >> >> arch/um/drivers/line.c: In function 'line_ioctl': >> arch/um/drivers/line.c:306: error: implicit declaration of function 'tioclinux' >> make[1]: *** [arch/um/drivers/line.o] Error 1 >> >> >> This commit may cause it. >> >> commit 1aa5f1fab397054a9133bcaf511973db5a6b97be >> Author: Alan Cox >> Date: Mon Aug 11 10:27:35 2008 +1000 >> >> tty-fixup-uml >> >> Add a new nicer hook for tioclinux > > It looks like it may be fixed in today's linux-next as that patch has > been updated. > Hi, thanks for working. I got a linkage error, next; arch/um/drivers/built-in.o: In function `line_ioctl': /data/kernel/mainline/workdir/next/.branches/um/linux/arch/um/drivers/line.c:306: undefined reference to `tioclinux' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status KSYM .tmp_kallsyms1.S nm: '.tmp_vmlinux1': No such file No valid symbol. make: *** [.tmp_kallsyms1.S] Error 1 The tioclinux() is in drivers/char/vt.c and this is compiled when CONFIG_HW_CONSOLE is enabled. I think this config is never turned on in uml, because of the following definition in drivers/char/Kconfig; config HW_CONSOLE bool depends on VT && !S390 && !UML default y thanks, Hiroshi Shimamoto