From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 27 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:37:37 +0200 Message-ID: <48B7C361.9070008@kernel.org> References: <20080827183453.eb651f50.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <58cb370e0808270757k583c0fc2oc659bc8e2dd6c21e@mail.gmail.com> <200808272145.20627.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200808290210.37211.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20080829070515.GL20055@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080829070515.GL20055@kernel.dk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Ingo Molnar , dm-devel@redhat.com List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: >> On the somehow related topic - CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT which is >> introduced by commit 3e5ba59bbab878f60b8b87004ac55a464bddc819 ("block: >> implement CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT") is way too intrusive to be >> enabled by default if CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL is set as it easily results >> in no longer bootable systems (+ help entry for the new option says >> "Say N if you are unsure."). >> >> Tejun/Jens: please consider changing this. > > I have change the default to 'n' for now. Hmmm... it broke booting? Bart, can you please elaborate a bit what got broken? Did it fail to locate the root partition or were you using static device nodes? Thanks. -- tejun