From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for September 5
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 06:20:07 +0400
Message-ID: <48C72ED7.4000000@suse.de>
References: <20080905190941.0f86ebac.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <48C51CF8.2030208@suse.de> <48C6F031.1050300@suse.de> <200809100257.56108.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from charybdis-ext.suse.de ([195.135.221.2]:34407 "EHLO
	emea5-mh.id5.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751594AbYIJCUI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 22:20:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <200809100257.56108.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org

Hi Bartlomiej,

Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Hi Bartolmiej,
>>
>> This patch is really important for many people, and your report
>> blocks it from being used.
> 
> Interesting, "bad" bugreport blocks "good" patch from being used?
I am sorry if it sounds that way, your bug report is good and certainly
helps.
> 
> While the patch may be really important for some people it broke
> things here in the major way and you sent me the updated patch
> only _yesterday_.
Sorry once again to urge you.
Thanks again for both reporting bug report and testing.
Please take a look at bugs #9998, #10724, #10919 if you interested in
how important this patch is :)

Regards,
Alex.