From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: next-20081030: voyager compile busted Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:42:08 -0700 Message-ID: <490A2A30.5040905@zytor.com> References: <20081030173030.d8847df6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081030180323.GA13399@x200.localdomain> <1225398287.19324.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20081030205230.GO27407@elte.hu> <1225400283.19324.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20081030210704.GA25665@elte.hu> <1225401708.19324.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:56281 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759494AbYJ3Vmi (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:42:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1225401708.19324.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: James Bottomley Cc: Ingo Molnar , Alexey Dobriyan , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Yinghai Lu James Bottomley wrote: > > Before you advocate this, think what it would entail. Voyager replaces > (and has to replace because its not apic based) the entirety of smp.c > and smpboot.c ... they'd all have to be abstracted through function > pointers. > ... or through patched direct calls, which is of course also a possibility. -hpa