From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 19 (mtd build error) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:45:52 -0800 Message-ID: <49246CF0.9010105@oracle.com> References: <20081119175917.7d21cf77.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081119105321.477e618a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <1227121104.27728.618.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <492463A1.3000306@oracle.com> <1227122287.3052.7.camel@achroite> <1227122696.27728.625.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <1227123805.3052.10.camel@achroite> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from acsinet12.oracle.com ([141.146.126.234]:43454 "EHLO acsinet12.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751761AbYKSTqH (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:46:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1227123805.3052.10.camel@achroite> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ben Hutchings Cc: David Woodhouse , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 19:24 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 19:18 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> So does the dependency need to be something like >>> "depends on SFC && MTD && !(SFC=y && MTD=m)"? >> If it's a separate driver, perhaps it's sufficient just to make it a >> tristate and make it depend on SFC && MTD? > > It's not a separate driver. and it already depends on SFC && MTD. Weird that it fails like this. -- ~Randy