linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ttydev tree
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:46:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <494127CC.6060800@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081211102122.5fe69850@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>

Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:26:45 +1100
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the ttydev tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/serial/8250.c between commit
>> 507ce132910803e8fd1116467e99f59da3d526f0 ("iop13xx: workaround errata
>> that causes uart interrupts to be missed") from the async_tx tree and
>> commit 63c4074301f79f1620d6c880973d6ef1cc770990
>> ("tty-serial-8250-regops") from the ttydev tree.
>>
>> I have reverted the async_tx commit for today. Please try to figure out
>> what should happen here.
> 
> Dan - can you feed the uart 8250 patches through the ttydev tree or are
> there dependancies on other parts of async_tx ?
> 


No, this purely my fault.  That is a debugging patch I use when testing 
my tree on iop13xx and I inadvertantly included it in my latest push to 
-next.  It has been removed.  Sorry for the noise.

Regards,
Dan

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-11 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-11  6:26 linux-next: manual merge of the ttydev tree Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-11 10:21 ` Alan Cox
2008-12-11 14:46   ` Dan Williams [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-19  2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-19  2:53 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-25  8:33 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-25  8:24 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-22  5:51 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-21  8:03 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-21 10:21 ` Alan Cox
2008-08-21 12:14   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-19  7:43 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-19 19:57 ` Greg KH
2008-08-18  6:08 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-14  5:50 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-12  6:58 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-12 20:42 ` Greg KH
2008-08-12  6:55 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-23  6:47 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-22  6:37 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-22 10:31 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-21  7:20 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-18  8:48 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-18  8:41 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-18  8:28 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-18  8:23 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-18  8:20 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-18  8:49 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-18 10:49   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-18 10:55     ` David Miller
2008-07-18 11:00       ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-04  9:11 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-04 15:41 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-01 14:12 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 14:16 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-01 14:09 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 14:14 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-01 14:07 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 14:12 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-01 14:43   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-01 15:42     ` Alan Cox
2008-07-01 16:45       ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-01 14:04 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 13:56 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 13:54 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 13:43 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 12:43 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 14:09 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-01 15:07   ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-01 15:29     ` Alan Cox
2008-07-02  9:01       ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-02  9:17         ` Alan Cox
2008-07-02  9:50           ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-02  9:43             ` Alan Cox
2008-07-01 12:35 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 11:57 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 11:59 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-07-01 15:25   ` Greg KH
2008-07-01 11:44 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 11:37 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 11:33 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-12 18:59 ` Jesper Juhl
2008-07-12 20:29   ` Alan Cox
2008-07-13  1:20   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 11:23 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 11:17 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 11:10 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-01 11:56 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-01 16:18   ` David Brownell
2008-07-01 16:27     ` Alan Cox
2008-07-01 10:59 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=494127CC.6060800@intel.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).