From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@googlemail.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: force nr_cpumask_bit to NR_CPUS for CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:44:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49417B99.7090004@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812101019.42908.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Re: cpumask conversions, or not?
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 December 2008 21:26:36 Mike Travis wrote:
>> Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The new cpumask conversions are going well, but unfortunately Stephen
>>> uncovered a nasty bug via linux-next: the new cpumask operators only go to
>>> nr_cpumask_bits which can be less than NR_CPUS if NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG.
>>> The undefined bits confuse the old cpumask operators. We fixed one case,
>>> but I am concerned that we will break archs as we convert more core code.
>> Hi Rusty,
>>
>> I think we can avoid this problem if we make cpumask_bits == NR_CPUS iff
>> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n. This complies with the current cpumask_t
>> approach and should cause all cpumask operators to always operate on
>> all cpumask bits.
>
> A very good point. And it's no worse than the old method.
>
> OK, forget about this for now, no urgent conversions needed :)
> Rusty.
This probably should be submitted through linux-next for wider test coverage?
Thanks,
Mike
---
cpumask: force nr_cpumask_bits to be NR_CPUS when CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is false
This maintains compatibility with the current cpumask_t. Once an architecture
is "cpumask clean" [IOW, all references span 0..(nr_cpus_ids-1) only, ignoring
any bits >= nr_cpu_ids], then it can set CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y.
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
---
include/linux/cpumask.h | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6-for-ingo.orig/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ linux-2.6-for-ingo/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -510,9 +510,6 @@ extern cpumask_t cpu_active_map;
[BITS_TO_LONGS(NR_CPUS)-1] = CPU_MASK_LAST_WORD \
}
-/* This produces more efficient code. */
-#define nr_cpumask_bits NR_CPUS
-
#else /* NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG */
#define CPU_BITS_ALL \
@@ -521,9 +518,20 @@ extern cpumask_t cpu_active_map;
[BITS_TO_LONGS(NR_CPUS)-1] = CPU_MASK_LAST_WORD \
}
-#define nr_cpumask_bits nr_cpu_ids
#endif /* NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG */
+#ifndef CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
+
+/* This produces more efficient code. */
+#define nr_cpumask_bits NR_CPUS
+
+#else
+
+/* This allows for variabled-sized cpumask's */
+#define nr_cpumask_bits nr_cpu_ids
+
+#endif
+
/* verify cpu argument to cpumask_* operators */
static inline unsigned int cpumask_check(unsigned int cpu)
{
next parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-11 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200812082136.33212.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
[not found] ` <493E4EE4.6010609@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <200812101019.42908.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2008-12-11 20:44 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2008-12-11 23:10 ` [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: force nr_cpumask_bit to NR_CPUS for CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n Mike Travis
2008-12-13 9:55 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49417B99.7090004@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=schwidefsky@googlemail.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).