linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@googlemail.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: force nr_cpumask_bit to NR_CPUS for CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:44:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49417B99.7090004@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812101019.42908.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Re: cpumask conversions, or not?

Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 December 2008 21:26:36 Mike Travis wrote:
>> Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>    The new cpumask conversions are going well, but unfortunately Stephen
>>> uncovered a nasty bug via linux-next: the new cpumask operators only go to
>>> nr_cpumask_bits which can be less than NR_CPUS if NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG.
>>> The undefined bits confuse the old cpumask operators.  We fixed one case,
>>> but I am concerned that we will break archs as we convert more core code.
>> Hi Rusty,
>>
>> I think we can avoid this problem if we make cpumask_bits == NR_CPUS iff
>> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n.  This complies with the current cpumask_t
>> approach and should cause all cpumask operators to always operate on
>> all cpumask bits.
> 
> A very good point.  And it's no worse than the old method.
> 
> OK, forget about this for now, no urgent conversions needed :)
> Rusty.

This probably should be submitted through linux-next for wider test coverage?

Thanks,
Mike
---
cpumask: force nr_cpumask_bits to be NR_CPUS when CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is false

This maintains compatibility with the current cpumask_t.  Once an architecture
is "cpumask clean" [IOW, all references span 0..(nr_cpus_ids-1) only, ignoring
any bits >= nr_cpu_ids], then it can set CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y.

Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
---
 include/linux/cpumask.h |   16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- linux-2.6-for-ingo.orig/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ linux-2.6-for-ingo/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -510,9 +510,6 @@ extern cpumask_t cpu_active_map;
 	[BITS_TO_LONGS(NR_CPUS)-1] = CPU_MASK_LAST_WORD	\
 }
 
-/* This produces more efficient code. */
-#define nr_cpumask_bits	NR_CPUS
-
 #else /* NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG */
 
 #define CPU_BITS_ALL						\
@@ -521,9 +518,20 @@ extern cpumask_t cpu_active_map;
 	[BITS_TO_LONGS(NR_CPUS)-1] = CPU_MASK_LAST_WORD		\
 }
 
-#define nr_cpumask_bits	nr_cpu_ids
 #endif /* NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG */
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
+
+/* This produces more efficient code. */
+#define nr_cpumask_bits	NR_CPUS
+
+#else
+
+/* This allows for variabled-sized cpumask's */
+#define nr_cpumask_bits	nr_cpu_ids
+
+#endif
+
 /* verify cpu argument to cpumask_* operators */
 static inline unsigned int cpumask_check(unsigned int cpu)
 {

       reply	other threads:[~2008-12-11 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200812082136.33212.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
     [not found] ` <493E4EE4.6010609@sgi.com>
     [not found]   ` <200812101019.42908.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2008-12-11 20:44     ` Mike Travis [this message]
2008-12-11 23:10       ` [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: force nr_cpumask_bit to NR_CPUS for CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n Mike Travis
2008-12-13  9:55       ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49417B99.7090004@sgi.com \
    --to=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=schwidefsky@googlemail.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).