From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Smart <James.Smart@Emulex.Com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: scsi tree build warnings
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:44:44 -0500
Message-ID: <4947F71C.8030807@emulex.com>
References: <20081211132503.bc5e5994.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>	<49412544.8010104@emulex.com> <20081212103057.714c6627.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from emulex.emulex.com ([138.239.112.1]:47888 "EHLO
	emulex.emulex.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751689AbYLPSn0 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:43:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20081212103057.714c6627.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>, "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>

fyi - patch for this was posted:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=122944234826143&w=2

-- james s

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:35:48 -0500 James Smart <James.Smart@Emulex.Com> wrote:
>> we're cleaning this up now...
> 
> Thanks.
>