From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Travis Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:02:54 -0800 Message-ID: <4949851E.5000304@sgi.com> References: <200812011646.35018.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <4949831B.2000809@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.179.30]:39976 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752187AbYLQXC4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:02:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4949831B.2000809@sgi.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Rusty Russell Cc: Ingo Molnar , Stephen Rothwell , LKML , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Jack Steiner Mike Travis wrote: > Rusty Russell wrote: >> Like cpu_coregroup_map, but returns a (const) pointer. >> >> (This will go to Ingo separately as part of the x86 series, just >> airing it here for thoroughness). >> >> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell >> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis >> Cc: Ingo Molnar > > I've pulled this patch into the queue for my cpus4096-for-ingo tree. > > [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86 > > I can also line up a queue for sched related changes: > > [PATCH 4/4] cpumask: Replace cpu_coregroup_map with cpu_coregroup_map() > > Is there any status on the corresponding changes for sparc, s390? (I assume > that they'll need to be merged into linux-next?) > > [PATCH 2/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): sparc > [PATCH 3/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): s390 Oops, never mind. I just noticed that all 4 have already been pushed via linux-next. Ingo - how do we get these back into -tip for testing with other cpus4096 changes? Do I need to do anything? Thanks, Mike