linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, mingo@elte.hu
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	mel@csn.ul.ie
Subject: Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333	smp_call_function_mask
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 02:05:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4954AC7B.3020603@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081226091217.GA5100@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> [2008-12-24 12:34:41]:
> 
>> --
> 
> After the applying the patch, the kernel panic's with the same backtrace. The
> box is running Fedora 5 on it.
> 

please try...
Ingo, do we need to switch to use #idef and inline function instead?

YH


[PATCH] sparseirq: add printk to workaround compiler optimizing

Impact: fix panic on null pointer with sparseirq

some compiler seems to inline the weak global function.
try to workaround it

also remove duplicated arch_early_irq_init()
already have one weak copy in init/main.c

Signed-off-by: Yinghai <yinghai@kernel.org>

---
 init/main.c         |    2 ++
 kernel/irq/handle.c |    7 ++-----
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/init/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/init/main.c
+++ linux-2.6/init/main.c
@@ -544,10 +544,12 @@ void __init __weak thread_info_cache_ini
 
 void __init __weak arch_early_irq_init(void)
 {
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling __weak arch_early_irq_init\n");
 }
 
 void __init __weak early_irq_init(void)
 {
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling __weak early_irq_init\n");
 	arch_early_irq_init();
 }
 
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -56,10 +56,6 @@ void handle_bad_irq(unsigned int irq, st
 int nr_irqs = NR_IRQS;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nr_irqs);
 
-void __init __attribute__((weak)) arch_early_irq_init(void)
-{
-}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
 static struct irq_desc irq_desc_init = {
 	.irq	    = -1,
@@ -90,8 +86,9 @@ void init_kstat_irqs(struct irq_desc *de
 		desc->kstat_irqs = (unsigned int *)ptr;
 }
 
-void __attribute__((weak)) arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
+void __weak arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
 {
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling __weak arch_init_chip_data\n");
 }
 
 static void init_one_irq_desc(int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-26 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-16 11:37 linux-next: Tree for December 16 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-16 23:26 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-17  6:59   ` linux-next: mtd tree build failures (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16) Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-17  9:32     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-12-17  9:57       ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-17  7:07   ` linux-next: Tree for December 16 Artem Bityutskiy
2008-12-17  7:08 ` next-20081216 - powerpc link error 'dynreloc miscount' Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-17  7:28   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-17  7:30   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-19 10:54 ` [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-19 11:51   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-19 13:46     ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-19 21:02       ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-23 13:21         ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-23 21:09           ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-24 16:34             ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-24 20:34               ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-26  9:12                 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-26 10:05                   ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2008-12-26 10:27                     ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-26 13:33                       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-26 13:42                         ` [PATCH] kbuild, sparseirq: work around GCC bug with __weak aliases Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27  4:09                           ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-27 10:59                             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-28 23:27                               ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-26 15:28                       ` [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-26 15:33                         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-26 17:04                           ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-26 18:17                             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27  7:11                               ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-27  7:14                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-27  7:39                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-27  8:37                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27  8:39                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 11:21                                       ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-27 11:24                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 11:57                                           ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-27 12:26                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 15:29                                               ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-27 21:10                                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-28 12:55                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-28 16:11                                                   ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-28 23:09                                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-27  5:05                       ` [PATCH] perf_counter: more barrier in blank weak function Yinghai Lu
2008-12-27  5:06                         ` [PATCH] kgdb: " Yinghai Lu
2008-12-27  8:17                           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27  8:34                             ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-27  6:07                         ` [PATCH] perf_counter: " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-27  9:46                       ` [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask David Howells
2008-12-27  9:50                         ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4954AC7B.3020603@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).