linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	mel@csn.ul.ie
Subject: Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333	smp_call_function_mask
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 15:09:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49580721.8010201@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081228161119.GA29660@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> [2008-12-28 13:55:10]:
> 
>> * Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ingo,
>>>
>>> 	kernel still crashes, with the updated patch.
>> hm, i thought we got all bugs fixed - could you try latest tip/master:
>>
>>   http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
>>
>> does it still crash in the same way? (if yes then please attach the new 
>> crashlog if it's easy to do)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> 	Ingo
> 
> Hi Ingo/Yinghai,
> 
> 	I tried today's tip/master against 2.6.28, the kernel still crashes
> at boot up.

please try following patch on top of tip/master

YH

---

[PATCH] sparseirq: change arch_init_chip_data to pointer

Impact: fix panic

some gcc compiler will remove the weak global blank function

try to workaround it:
1. one time path: add printk
2. multi time path: change to function pointer

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c |    7 ++++++-
 include/linux/irq.h       |    2 +-
 init/main.c               |    4 ++++
 kernel/irq/handle.c       |    5 ++++-
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
@@ -170,6 +170,8 @@ static struct irq_cfg irq_cfgx[NR_IRQS]
 	[15] = { .vector = IRQ15_VECTOR, },
 };
 
+static int real_arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu);
+
 int __init arch_early_irq_init(void)
 {
 	struct irq_cfg *cfg;
@@ -189,6 +191,9 @@ int __init arch_early_irq_init(void)
 			cpumask_setall(cfg[i].domain);
 	}
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
+	arch_init_chip_data = real_arch_init_chip_data;
+#endif
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -232,7 +237,7 @@ static struct irq_cfg *get_one_free_irq_
 	return cfg;
 }
 
-int arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
+static int real_arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
 {
 	struct irq_cfg *cfg;
 
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/irq.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/irq.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/irq.h
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ struct irq_desc {
 
 extern int early_irq_init(void);
 extern int arch_early_irq_init(void);
-extern int arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu);
+extern int (*arch_init_chip_data)(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu);
 extern void arch_init_copy_chip_data(struct irq_desc *old_desc,
 					struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu);
 extern void arch_free_chip_data(struct irq_desc *old_desc, struct irq_desc *desc);
Index: linux-2.6/init/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/init/main.c
+++ linux-2.6/init/main.c
@@ -544,11 +544,15 @@ void __init __weak thread_info_cache_ini
 
 int __init __weak arch_early_irq_init(void)
 {
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling __weak arch_early_irq_init()\n");
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
 int __init __weak early_irq_init(void)
 {
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling __weak early_irq_init()\n");
+
 	return arch_early_irq_init();
 }
 
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -86,11 +86,14 @@ void init_kstat_irqs(struct irq_desc *de
 		desc->kstat_irqs = (unsigned int *)ptr;
 }
 
-int __weak arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
+static int weak_arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int (*arch_init_chip_data)(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu) =
+			 weak_arch_init_chip_data;
+
 static void init_one_irq_desc(int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
 {
 	memcpy(desc, &irq_desc_init, sizeof(struct irq_desc));

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-28 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-16 11:37 linux-next: Tree for December 16 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-16 23:26 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-17  6:59   ` linux-next: mtd tree build failures (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16) Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-17  9:32     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-12-17  9:57       ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-17  7:07   ` linux-next: Tree for December 16 Artem Bityutskiy
2008-12-17  7:08 ` next-20081216 - powerpc link error 'dynreloc miscount' Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-17  7:28   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-17  7:30   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-19 10:54 ` [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-19 11:51   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-19 13:46     ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-19 21:02       ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-23 13:21         ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-23 21:09           ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-24 16:34             ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-24 20:34               ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-26  9:12                 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-26 10:05                   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-26 10:27                     ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-26 13:33                       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-26 13:42                         ` [PATCH] kbuild, sparseirq: work around GCC bug with __weak aliases Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27  4:09                           ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-27 10:59                             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-28 23:27                               ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-26 15:28                       ` [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-26 15:33                         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-26 17:04                           ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-26 18:17                             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27  7:11                               ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-27  7:14                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-27  7:39                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-27  8:37                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27  8:39                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 11:21                                       ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-27 11:24                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 11:57                                           ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-27 12:26                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 15:29                                               ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-27 21:10                                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-28 12:55                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-28 16:11                                                   ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-28 23:09                                                     ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2008-12-27  5:05                       ` [PATCH] perf_counter: more barrier in blank weak function Yinghai Lu
2008-12-27  5:06                         ` [PATCH] kgdb: " Yinghai Lu
2008-12-27  8:17                           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27  8:34                             ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-27  6:07                         ` [PATCH] perf_counter: " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-27  9:46                       ` [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask David Howells
2008-12-27  9:50                         ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49580721.8010201@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).