linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:54:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <495A5259.2080208@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1230651870.3296.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>

James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 19:53 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:16:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20081219:
>>>
>>> Undropped tree:
>>> 	scci
>>> 	mtd
>>>
>>> Dropped trees (temporarily):
>>> 	nfs (akpm request due to 2.6.30 features)
>>> 	kvm (build problem)
>>> 	rr (build poblem)
>>> 	semaphore-removal (due to unfixed conflicts against Linus' tree)
>>> 	cpu_alloc (build problem)
>>> 	audit (difficult conflicts)
>>>
>>> Linus' tree had three build failures requiring patches and one requiring
>>> a revert.
>>
>> >From drivers/scsi/Kconfig:
>>
>> config LIBFC
>> 	tristate "LibFC module"
>> 	depends on SCSI && SCSI_FC_ATTRS
>> 	---help---
>> 	  Fibre Channel library module
>>
>> config FCOE
>> 	tristate "FCoE module"
>> 	depends on SCSI
>> 	select LIBFC
>> 	---help---
>> 	  Fibre Channel over Ethernet module
>>
>>
>> Aside from being very skimpy help messages, nothing there requires
>> SCSI_FC_ATTRS to be enabled for FCOE, so when FCOE is enabled,
>> LIBFC is selected, and then bang:
>>
>> ERROR: "scsi_is_fc_rport" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: "fc_remote_port_delete" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: "fc_remote_port_add" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: "fc_release_transport" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: "fc_remove_host" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: "fc_attach_transport" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.ko] undefined!
> 
> I checked the select of an option that selects, it seems to work nicely,
> so I think this is the fix.  The custom has been to select the
> attributes rather than depend on them anyway.  There's also no need to
> depend on SCSI since the whole thing is enclosed in an if SCSI_LOWLEVEL
> && SCSI.
> 
> James
> 
> ---
> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
> index 0e5e084..9f4cc8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
> @@ -607,13 +607,12 @@ config SCSI_FLASHPOINT
>  
>  config LIBFC
>  	tristate "LibFC module"
> -	depends on SCSI && SCSI_FC_ATTRS
> +	select SCSI_FC_ATTRS
>  	---help---
>  	  Fibre Channel library module
>  
>  config FCOE
>  	tristate "FCoE module"
> -	depends on SCSI
>  	select LIBFC
>  	---help---
>  	  Fibre Channel over Ethernet module
> 
> 

This still has a build error when CONFIG_PCI=n:


linux-next-20081229/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fc_transport_fcoe.c: In function 'fcoe_load_transport_driver':
linux-next-20081229/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fc_transport_fcoe.c:324: error: 'pci_bus_type' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[4]: *** [drivers/scsi/fcoe/fc_transport_fcoe.o] Error 1



-- 
~Randy

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-30 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-29 16:16 linux-next: Tree for December 29 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 20:31 ` linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe) Randy Dunlap
2008-12-29 21:35   ` James Bottomley
2008-12-29 21:45     ` James Bottomley
2008-12-29 22:21       ` Randy Dunlap
2008-12-29 20:35 ` linux-next: Tree for December 29 (cxgb3i) Randy Dunlap
2008-12-29 21:51   ` James Bottomley
2008-12-29 22:10     ` Randy Dunlap
2008-12-29 21:01 ` [PATCH -next] cxgb3i: use same dependencies as CHELSIO_T3 Randy Dunlap
2008-12-29 21:23   ` [PATCH -next v2] cxgb3i: use same dependencies & selects " Randy Dunlap
2008-12-29 21:58     ` James Bottomley
2008-12-29 22:08       ` Randy Dunlap
2008-12-30 16:20         ` James Bottomley
2008-12-30  3:53 ` linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc) Randy Dunlap
2008-12-30 15:44   ` James Bottomley
2008-12-30 16:54     ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2008-12-30 17:12       ` James Bottomley
2008-12-30 17:36         ` Randy Dunlap
2008-12-30 17:40         ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-30 15:45 ` [BUILD-FAILURE] fcoe driver build fails with !CONFIG_PCI Kamalesh Babulal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=495A5259.2080208@oracle.com \
    --to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.w.love@intel.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).