Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree

[Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>]

Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Friday 02 January 2009 13:05:57 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Rusty,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the rr_cpumask tree got a conflict in
>> arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c between commit
>> 22f65d31b25a320a5246592160bcb102d2791c45 ("x86: Update io_apic.c to use
>> new cpumask API") from the cpus4096 tree and commit
>> 2ca1a615835d9f4990f42102ab1f2ef434e7e89c ("Merge branch 'master' of
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6") (or
>> something - I suspect git has failed me a little here)
> 
> Yes, I've had several 'git blame' pointing to merges from Ingo's tree.
> And they tend to be n-way merges, so tracing it down is too hard.
> 
> The cpus4096 tree is supposed to have already merged the cpumask tree,
> so this should not have happened.
> 
>> I have dropped the rr_cpumask tree for today and also the rr tree that
>> depends on it.
> 
> OK I will remove this dependency for the moment.
> 
> Rusty.

Hi Rusty & Stephen,

Thanks for dealing with these thorny issues.

Yes, if there's a more pita file than sched.c it's io_apic.c ... ;-)

Cheers,
Mike