From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 13:08:06 +0200
Message-ID: <49609896.201@redhat.com>
References: <20081223002514.6fbcfe4f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>	<20081229161750.e2197bad.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090102115354.46fc59e0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:33288 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751225AbZADLIR (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 4 Jan 2009 06:08:17 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20090102115354.46fc59e0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> And again.  Can you please find some fix for this so that the kvm tree
> can get some integration testing ...
>   

Hollis, help!

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function