From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Korolev Alexey <akorolev@infradead.org>,
Vasiliy Leonenko <vasiliy.leonenko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (MTD)
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:29:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <496386DB.8090606@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090106182311.525e4b14.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This tree will not build a powerpc ppc4xx_defconfig due to a kvm problem.
>
> Changes since 20090105:
>
> New tree:
> squashfs
>
> Undropped tree:
> usb
> staging
>
> Dropped trees (temporarily):
> rr (build problem)
> semaphore-removal (due to unfixed conflicts against Linus' tree)
> cpu_alloc (build problem)
> audit (difficult conflicts)
>
>
> The mtd tree lost 3 conflicts.
drivers/built-in.o: In function `lpddr_probe':
(.text+0x95ddc): undefined reference to `lpddr_cmdset'
with
# CONFIG_MTD_LPDDR is not set
CONFIG_MTD_QINFO_PROBE=y
There appears to be too little control/coordination between those
two kconfig symbols. Surely one of them (MTD_QINFO_PROBE) should
depend on the other (MTD_LPDDR). And why even build 2 modules
when MTD_QINFO_PROBE is enabled? Why not combine the code into
one module?
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-06 7:23 linux-next: Tree for January 6 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-06 16:29 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2009-01-06 17:36 ` linux-next: Tree for January 6 (MTD) Alexey Korolev
2009-01-06 21:16 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-09 21:48 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-06 21:23 ` linux-next: Tree for January 6 (wimax errs) Randy Dunlap
2009-01-06 21:50 ` Iñaky Pérez-González
2009-01-07 8:09 ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2009-01-07 0:25 ` linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/altpciehdma) Randy Dunlap
2009-01-07 0:26 ` linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/comedi) Randy Dunlap
2009-01-07 0:35 ` linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/meilhaus) Randy Dunlap
2009-01-07 0:37 ` linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/android) Randy Dunlap
2009-01-07 0:39 ` linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/android #2) Randy Dunlap
2009-01-07 0:53 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=496386DB.8090606@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=akorolev@infradead.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=vasiliy.leonenko@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).