From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 13 (gfs2 build error) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:31:40 -0800 Message-ID: <496D083C.3060109@oracle.com> References: <20090113175145.cdfa9c6a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from acsinet12.oracle.com ([141.146.126.234]:51079 "EHLO acsinet12.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753614AbZAMVcJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:32:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090113175145.cdfa9c6a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , swhiteho@redhat.com, cluster-devel@redhat.com Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today, I merged the updates to Linus' and the powerpc trees that happened > during the day. > > Changes since 20090112: When CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING=n, this construct: .setlease = generic_setlease, refers to a macro, not a function, so the address of it fails with: fs/gfs2/ops_file.c:746: error: 'generic_ setlease' undeclared here (not in a function) -- ~Randy