From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:43:12 -0800 Message-ID: <49874CD0.4000104@kernel.org> References: <20090202200254.b89614d8.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:58517 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752956AbZBBTnn (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:43:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090202200254.b89614d8.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: "David S. Miller" , Ingo Molnar , linux-next@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Dave, Ingo, > > Today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig) failed like this: > > arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c: In function 'perfctr_irq': > arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c:97: error: 'struct kernel_stat' has no member named 'irqs' > > Probably caused by commit e5553a6d04421eec326a629571d696e8e745a0e4 > ("sparc64: Implement NMI watchdog on capable cpus") from the > sparc-current tree interacting with commit > d7e51e66899f95dabc89b4d4c6674a6e50fa37fc ("sparseirq: make some func to > be used with genirq") from the sparseirq tree. > > I have temporarily applied the patch below. I don't know if it is > correct (but it fixes the build). If it is, it should be applicable to > the sparc-current tree as the needed interface exists in Linus' current > tree. that is right fix. YH