From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Wise Subject: Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math. Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:44:42 -0600 Message-ID: <4992F26A.4030800@opengridcomputing.com> References: <20090210184448.22891.31130.stgit@dell3.ogc.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org To: Roland Dreier Cc: randy.dunlap@oracle.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Roland Dreier wrote: > I'll roll this into the offending patch (that is in -next). > > But: > > > - wqe->recv.sgl[i].to = cpu_to_be64(((u32) wr->sg_list[i].addr) % > > - (1UL << (12 + page_size[i]))); > > + wqe->recv.sgl[i].to = cpu_to_be64(((u64) wr->sg_list[i].addr) & > > + ((1UL << (12 + page_size[i]))-1)); > > Is this required? Strength reduction optimization should do this > automatically (and the code has been there for quite a while, so > obviously it isn't causing problems) > > - R. > Note that wr->sg_list[i].addr was being cast to a u32. That was wrong.