From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 6 (ath9k) Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:41:02 -0800 Message-ID: <49B17C4E.3000004@oracle.com> References: <20090306191311.697e7b97.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <49B17320.8010000@oracle.com> <49B17B12.3050200@openwrt.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from acsinet12.oracle.com ([141.146.126.234]:46418 "EHLO acsinet12.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752930AbZCFTjy (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:39:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <49B17B12.3050200@openwrt.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Gabor Juhos Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linville@tuxdriver.com" Gabor Juhos wrote: > Randy Dunlap =EDrta: >> Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Linus' release of -rc7 seems to have stirred people up a bit ... >>> >>> Changes since 20090305: >> >> when CONFIG_RFKILL=3Dn, ath9k/virtual.c causes: >> >> (.text+0x224e83): undefined reference to `ath_radio_disable' >> (.text+0x224e8b): undefined reference to `ath_radio_enable' >> >> >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I have submitted a patch for this already: > http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-wireless&m=3D123633468314970&w=3D2 >=20 > Should I send it to somewhere else as well? It hasn't propagated into the linux-next merging yet... --=20 ~Randy