From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dwmw2@infradead.org,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:52:53 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49BA3B05.9020906@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090313085930.GA19274@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:33:18AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:25, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 05:04:57PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>>>> I pretty quick time I can fix up the last couple on the above list.
>>>> But do we want to put all that change into 2.6.29-rc at this point?
>>> In general we do not want to have headers_check broken in mainline,
>> headers_check is not broken, headers_install is.
>>
>> Hmm, in some sense headers_check _is_ broken, as it doesn't notice
>> headers_install
>> installs headers that refer to other headers that are not installed...
> This is what scripts/headers_check are supposed to do - strange.
>
>> Greg, I had a quick look at your signcontext.h and signal.h merge, and the MMU
>> part seems to be OK.
>>
>> However, some of the installed headers still have checks for CONFIG_MMU:
>>
>> param.h:#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>> sigcontext.h:#ifndef CONFIG_MMU
>> sigcontext.h:#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>> siginfo.h:#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>> siginfo.h:#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>> siginfo.h:#endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
>> swab.h:#elif defined(CONFIG_MMU)
>>
>> so these have to be added to the generic unifdef-y list (is that
>> include/asm-generic/Kbuild.asm?).
Hmmm, yes your right.
> include/asm-generic/Kbuild.asm impacts all architectures so be carefull there.
> It looks like some updates to arch/m68k/include/asm/Kbuild is needed,
> and not the generic list of files to export.
>
> Also use og CONFIG_MMU suprises me.
> We used #ifdef __uClinux__ in the non-merged headers to avoid use
> of a CONFIG_* symbol that is not valid outside the kernel namespace.
> So if param.h in m68k uses CONFIG_MMU it is broken.
I have been trying to use CONFIG_MMU wherever possible (so for non-
exported headers), since that matches what is actually in the code
proper. I am concerned at the longer term use of __uClinux__ for
distinguishing MMU and non-MMU. I plan on switching to use a normal
m68k toolchain soon. And it won't define __uClinux__ on its own.
(I already do this on ARM for example - same toolchain on both
MMU an non-MMU).
What I have done so far is or the most part a very simple merge
of the files. I know there is room for some improvements in quite a
few of these files.
The use of CONFIG_MMU in swab.h (is this actually exported to user
space?) is not actually for code that is MMU or non-MMU. It is
actually architecture specific. Most ColdFire parts don't have the
"rolw" instruction. The condition test can be better. Geert, any
ideas on what is more appropriate here?
I can switch back to using __uClinux__ on siginfo.h and sigcontext.h.
If I am not mistaken we can't change these structures without breaking
backwards compatibility? The sigcontext change is particularly ugly :-(
Similarly for param.h, it looks like a switch back to using
__uClinux__ for now is the only option.
Now after these fixups should I create a git branch with these header
merges in for inclusion into 2.6.29-rc? To fix the regression we
only need to do the handful of files that Rob listed, right?
Regards
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear, a McAfee Company PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-13 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200903120437.03837.rob@landley.net>
[not found] ` <20090312095854.GA9398@uranus.ravnborg.org>
2009-03-12 20:03 ` make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7 Rob Landley
2009-03-12 20:58 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-03-12 23:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-12 21:02 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-03-12 22:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-03-13 3:25 ` Rob Landley
2009-03-13 7:04 ` Greg Ungerer
2009-03-13 8:25 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-03-13 8:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-03-13 8:59 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-03-13 10:52 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2009-03-13 12:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-03-16 12:40 ` Greg Ungerer
2009-03-16 20:20 ` Rob Landley
2009-03-16 22:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-03-16 23:09 ` Greg Ungerer
2009-03-16 23:10 ` Greg Ungerer
2009-03-18 4:03 ` Rob Landley
2009-03-18 5:34 ` Greg Ungerer
2009-03-18 18:12 ` Rob Landley
2009-03-18 23:53 ` Greg Ungerer
2009-03-19 7:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-03-19 8:41 ` Rob Landley
2009-03-13 8:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-03-13 6:53 ` Greg Ungerer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49BA3B05.9020906@snapgear.com \
--to=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).