From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [BUILD FAILURE 10/12] Next April 21 : PPC64 randconfig [drivers/mtd/maps/sbc8240.o] Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:00:24 -0500 Message-ID: <49EE25D8.6040906@freescale.com> References: <1240340059.9110.143.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net ([192.88.158.103]:50330 "EHLO az33egw02.freescale.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751272AbZDUUBu (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:01:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1240340059.9110.143.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Jim Cromie , carolyn.j.smith@exgate.tek.com, Adrian Bunk , sachinp , Stephen Rothwell , linux-kernel , Linuxppc-dev , linux-next , Alexander Beregalov Subrata Modak wrote: > This is a very old one. Doesn=C2=B4t seem to go away. Reported this e= arlier > on 14th April: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/14/483, >=20 > CC [M] drivers/mtd/maps/sbc8240.o > drivers/mtd/maps/sbc8240.c:31:1: warning: "DEBUG" redefined > In file included from drivers/mtd/maps/sbc8240.c:23: > include/linux/mtd/mtd.h:339:1: warning: this is the location of the > previous definition > drivers/mtd/maps/sbc8240.c: In function =E2=80=98init_sbc8240_mtd=E2=80= =99: > drivers/mtd/maps/sbc8240.c:172: error: =E2=80=98sbc8240_mtd=E2=80=99 = undeclared (first > use in this function) > drivers/mtd/maps/sbc8240.c:172: error: (Each undeclared identifier is > reported only once > drivers/mtd/maps/sbc8240.c:172: error: for each function it appears i= n.) > drivers/mtd/maps/sbc8240.c: In function =E2=80=98cleanup_sbc8240_mtd=E2= =80=99: > drivers/mtd/maps/sbc8240.c:233: error: =E2=80=98sbc8240_mtd=E2=80=99 = undeclared (first > use in this function) This looks like an arch/ppc orphan. It's not enabled by any defconfig,= =20 and it doesn't look like it does anything that physmap_of can't do. I'd just remove it. -Scott