From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, James Smart <James.Smart@Emulex.Com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: linux-next: block tree build failure
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:45:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0CBB19.8060006@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242216433.4728.0.camel@mulgrave.int.hansenpartnership.com>
Hello, James.
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 18:21 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> I have reverted commit b1f744937f1be3e6d3009382a755679133cf782d
>>> ("block: move completion related functions back to blk-core.c") and
>>> applied the following patch (which I realise is probably not
>>> correct) for today. Maybe someone can come up with a better
>>> solution for the scsi guys and me.
>> Hmmm... is there a SCSI tree which won't be rebased? Then I can pull
>> blk tree into it and SCSI tree can go on from that point on.
>
> Not really ... especially now there's a proposal to redo the mvsas
> patch. However, block can run a postmerge tree with the changes in
> them.
Aieee... Yeah, I guess I can maintain temporary merge tip for blk and
scsi (that's what you're talking about, right?). Out of curiousity,
is there any reason not to use more standard git workflow? Developers
(kernel devs at least) are now pretty comfortable with git and trees
merging and splitting off. I can't really see much value in rebasing
these days.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-15 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-13 4:04 linux-next: block tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-13 9:21 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-13 12:07 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-15 0:45 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-05-15 2:35 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-15 2:47 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-15 3:24 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-15 3:38 ` Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-07 8:44 Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-07 8:49 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-07 9:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-07 9:28 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-04 3:36 Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-04 7:43 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-04 13:54 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-04 22:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-05 9:20 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-27 3:34 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-27 5:31 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-27 5:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-07 2:55 Stephen Rothwell
[not found] ` <20091007135505.df1f058c.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-07 6:33 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-23 4:51 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-23 7:11 ` Lars Ellenberg
2009-09-23 7:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
[not found] ` <20090923071152.GA8000-pI6ZZpWkm2Ob3Om96lsyHpni2hclXnRB@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-23 11:12 ` Lars Ellenberg
[not found] ` <20090923111225.GC8000-pI6ZZpWkm2Ob3Om96lsyHpni2hclXnRB@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-23 11:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-14 4:27 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-14 6:25 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-11 4:32 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-11 5:30 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-01 4:59 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-01 5:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-01 5:38 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-01 8:13 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-01 8:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-07 3:49 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-07 6:38 ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-07 6:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-07 13:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-07 14:31 ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-08 3:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-08 6:55 ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-07 13:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-08 0:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-26 2:53 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-26 4:34 ` NeilBrown
2009-06-26 4:39 ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-26 5:49 ` Neil Brown
2009-06-26 9:00 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-25 4:35 Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-25 5:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-05-25 5:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-09 3:37 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-14 2:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-14 6:21 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-14 6:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-14 6:32 ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-26 10:29 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-26 10:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-26 10:47 ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-26 11:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-26 11:20 ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-26 11:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-26 11:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-11-26 11:25 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] <20081110145442.d60e57b7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2008-11-10 4:13 ` malahal
2008-11-10 4:46 ` malahal
2008-11-10 12:12 ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-18 3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-18 4:31 ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-15 5:18 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-15 5:38 ` Alex Dubov
2008-09-15 13:18 ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-03 6:15 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-03 6:34 ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-03 7:04 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-03 7:07 ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-03 8:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-03 16:05 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-03 16:27 ` Tejun Heo
2008-09-03 16:32 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-03 17:29 ` Tejun Heo
2008-09-04 4:06 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-29 5:07 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-29 9:00 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] <20080627165326.9222c841.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2008-06-27 7:00 ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-27 7:14 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A0CBB19.8060006@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).