From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 13:05:13 +0300 Message-ID: <4A152759.1050200@redhat.com> References: <20090521172122.bb12027c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4A15038B.1090204@redhat.com> <4A15049F.8000707@panasas.com> <4A150515.8030608@redhat.com> <4A150747.3070304@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:34360 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752321AbZEUKFf (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2009 06:05:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A150747.3070304@panasas.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gregory Haskins Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> I have userspace to test as well, which needs a ton of cross-compiled >> libraries. >> >> > > A cross compiler produces native foreign code. A Native distribution with > binary libraries will work just as well. > > Do you mean to set up all the build environment and dependencies? > Perhaps get a ready made ppc linux image, mount and chroot into it > and build that way. > > If only you had an emulator for ppc? > Life's too short for emulators. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function