From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sachin Sant Subject: Re: Next June 29: Boot failure with SLQB on s390 Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:26:05 +0530 Message-ID: <4A49EF45.2030407@in.ibm.com> References: <20090629164851.57263dbc.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4A488D08.30307@in.ibm.com> <20090629103123.GC9321@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <20090629103943.GA31299@wotan.suse.de> <4A49A3B4.5070501@in.ibm.com> <20090630083410.GA1114@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e23smtp05.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.147]:48678 "EHLO e23smtp05.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751687AbZF3K4R (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:56:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090630083410.GA1114@wotan.suse.de> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Nick Piggin Cc: Heiko Carstens , Pekka Enberg , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > If you are not seeing any extra messages from the patch, then it > could be that you are seeing ZERO_SIZE_PTR or similar errors as > well. I will ask if you can try the patch I sent in the other > thread. Still facing same problem after applying the patch you mentioned. Probably the s390 issue is different that the Power6 issue. Thanks -Sachin -- --------------------------------- Sachin Sant IBM Linux Technology Center India Systems and Technology Labs Bangalore, India ---------------------------------