linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: percpu/kvm/tip tree build failure
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:46:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AEEAA82.8070705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091102161722.eea4358d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On 11/02/2009 07:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> kernel/user-return-notifier.c: In function 'fire_user_return_notifiers':
> kernel/user-return-notifier.c:45: error: expected expression before ')' token
>
> Introduced by commit 7c68af6e32c73992bad24107311f3433c89016e2 ("core,
> x86: Add user return notifiers") from the tip and kvm trees but revealed
> by commit e0fdb0e050eae331046385643618f12452aa7e73 ("percpu: add __percpu
> for sparse") from the percpu tree.  Before that percpu tree commit,
> "put_cpu_var()" would compile without error (even though it really needs
> a parameter).
>
> I have applied the following patch for today.
>    

Ingo, can you queue this on x86/entry?

-- 

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-02  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-02  5:17 linux-next: percpu/kvm/tip tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-02  9:46 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-11-02 10:07   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-02 10:13     ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-02 10:28       ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AEEAA82.8070705@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).