From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: linux-next: percpu/kvm/tip tree build failure Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:13:03 +0200 Message-ID: <4AEEB0AF.5000904@redhat.com> References: <20091102161722.eea4358d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4AEEAA82.8070705@redhat.com> <20091102100735.GB16963@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20662 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755025AbZKBKOl (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 05:14:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091102100735.GB16963@elte.hu> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Tejun Heo , Rusty Russell , Christoph Lameter , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra On 11/02/2009 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> Ingo, can you queue this on x86/entry? >> > Already done, tested and pushed out. > Usually there is an ack from tip-bot? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function