From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 23 Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:04:39 -0800 Message-ID: <4B0B1507.4060202@oracle.com> References: <20091123185232.1423c56b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091123111510.9b0c0714.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <200911240924.54675.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rcsinet12.oracle.com ([148.87.113.124]:55325 "EHLO rgminet12.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753226AbZKWXE7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:04:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200911240924.54675.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Rusty Russell Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , gregkh@suse.de, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Rusty Russell wrote: > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:45:10 am Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:52:32 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20091120: >> >> Hey rr, >> >> This patch "param\:remove-useless-writable-charp.patch" has several typos >> that cause build errors in drivers/staging/. I sent patches for these errors >> to gregkh but he couldn't apply them. Please build STAGING (drivers/staging/) >> crap along with other build testing when you make changes. > > Hi Randy, > > Fixed. And I guess linux-next doesn't build staging? Seems a fair call, > I should have done so. I decided to check on linux-next (only checked x86_64 allmodconfig), and viola: CONFIG_STAGING=y CONFIG_STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD=y That is just too helpful. :( -- ~Randy