From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 23 Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:37:46 -0800 Message-ID: <4B0B1CCA.7070500@oracle.com> References: <20091123185232.1423c56b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091123111510.9b0c0714.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <200911240924.54675.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <4B0B1507.4060202@oracle.com> <20091124103641.abd7bd6b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rcsinet12.oracle.com ([148.87.113.124]:49667 "EHLO rgminet12.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756356AbZKWXjB (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:39:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091124103641.abd7bd6b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Randy Dunlap , Rusty Russell , gregkh@suse.de, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Randy, > > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:04:39 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: >> I decided to check on linux-next (only checked x86_64 allmodconfig), >> and viola: >> >> CONFIG_STAGING=y >> CONFIG_STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD=y >> >> That is just too helpful. :( > > The Kconfig was deliberately done so that the all{no,yes,mod}config > builds don't build the staging stuff. You need to explictly ask for it. > Otherwise I would spend all my time reporting/fixing errors and warnings > in linux-next. > no, you should just drop it after one build error. -- ~Randy