From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 23
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:42:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0B1DD2.9000404@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091123233843.GA13464@suse.de>
Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:33:18AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Rusty,
>>
>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:24:54 +1030 Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>>> And I guess linux-next doesn't build staging?
>> Correct - it breaks to much and too often :-)
>
> Yes, remember, it's crap, you don't want to build it :)
that's certainly one way to look at it, but I do spend time/effort
trying to get it to build, then send patches that either get dropped
or sit in a queue or ignored for a long time by their driver writer,
so you are just reinforcing the negativism associated with staging.
I don't think that's what you should be doing.
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-23 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-23 7:52 linux-next: Tree for November 23 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-23 13:04 ` Michal Simek
2009-11-23 13:19 ` Ralf Baechle
2009-11-23 13:43 ` Michal Simek
2009-11-23 19:15 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-11-23 22:54 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-23 23:04 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-11-23 23:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-23 23:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-11-23 23:43 ` Greg KH
2009-11-23 23:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-11-23 23:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-23 23:34 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-11-23 23:39 ` Greg KH
2009-11-23 23:43 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-11-23 23:38 ` Greg KH
2009-11-23 23:42 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2009-11-24 2:34 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-23 3:06 Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-23 15:43 ` Zimny Lech
2010-11-23 17:15 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-11-23 19:03 ` Zimny Lech
2010-11-23 19:04 ` Zimny Lech
2010-11-23 15:45 ` Zimny Lech
2010-11-23 16:32 ` Anca Emanuel
2010-11-23 17:11 ` Anca Emanuel
2010-11-25 5:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-24 9:24 ` Zimny Lech
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0B1DD2.9000404@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).