From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 23 Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:42:10 -0800 Message-ID: <4B0B1DD2.9000404@oracle.com> References: <20091123185232.1423c56b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091123111510.9b0c0714.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <200911240924.54675.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20091124103318.bfcb504c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091123233843.GA13464@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rcsinet11.oracle.com ([148.87.113.123]:21084 "EHLO rgminet11.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757541AbZKWXnT (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:43:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091123233843.GA13464@suse.de> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Greg KH Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Rusty Russell , Randy Dunlap , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:33:18AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Rusty, >> >> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:24:54 +1030 Rusty Russell wrote: >>> And I guess linux-next doesn't build staging? >> Correct - it breaks to much and too often :-) > > Yes, remember, it's crap, you don't want to build it :) that's certainly one way to look at it, but I do spend time/effort trying to get it to build, then send patches that either get dropped or sit in a queue or ignored for a long time by their driver writer, so you are just reinforcing the negativism associated with staging. I don't think that's what you should be doing. -- ~Randy