From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 23 Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:43:34 -0800 Message-ID: <4B0B1E26.5090900@oracle.com> References: <20091123185232.1423c56b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091123111510.9b0c0714.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <200911240924.54675.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20091124103318.bfcb504c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4B0B1BFE.9030508@oracle.com> <20091123233923.GA13539@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from acsinet12.oracle.com ([141.146.126.234]:65155 "EHLO acsinet12.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757196AbZKWXpf (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:45:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091123233923.GA13539@kroah.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Greg KH Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Rusty Russell , gregkh@suse.de, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 03:34:22PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi Rusty, >>> >>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:24:54 +1030 Rusty Russell wrote: >>>> And I guess linux-next doesn't build staging? >>> Correct - it breaks to much and too often :-) >>> >> then you would need to drop it. and then no problem. ;) > > No, we want the merge issues to be known about, and others use > linux-next to do -staging development on. then something better than a once-weekly merge cycle would help. > thanks, yeah, right. -- ~Randy