From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: linux-next: percpu tree build warning Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:32:48 +0900 Message-ID: <4B0F7290.6000007@gmail.com> References: <20091125214219.f37935e8.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4B0D23A6.8040902@kernel.org> <20091125134058.GA9097@elte.hu> <200911270846.02717.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20091127054128.GC13914@elte.hu> <4B0F6A67.9010706@kernel.org> <20091127062001.GA22149@elte.hu> <4B0F7224.9020509@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-px0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180]:57262 "EHLO mail-px0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751407AbZK0Gcs (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:32:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B0F7224.9020509@kernel.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Rusty Russell , Stephen Rothwell , Fr??d??ric Weisbecker , Peter Zijlstra , Christoph Lameter , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton 11/27/2009 03:31 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: ... > __percpu sparse annotation has almost complete coverage over the issue > including the visible queue telling that something is percpu. So, ^^^^^ cue, of course. dang workqueues. -- tejun