From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: problems in linux-next (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 1) Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:13:20 +0900 Message-ID: <4B1659E0.9020304@kernel.org> References: <20091201190301.0fb7abad.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4B14D6E2.2040704@petalogix.com> <20091201210343.f0a1d353.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4B152D22.9070001@kernel.org> <20091201160119.GA10826@elte.hu> <4B15A5A6.2090200@kernel.org> <4B161D7A.6040208@kernel.org> <4B164D48.1040508@petalogix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:55122 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752001AbZLBMNZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:13:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B164D48.1040508@petalogix.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: michal.simek@petalogix.com Cc: Ingo Molnar , Christoph Lameter , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Rusty Russell On 12/02/2009 08:19 PM, Michal Simek wrote: > I have problem to apply your patch against Stephens next tree. Which tree do you use? Oh.. this is still WIP and on top of whole lot of other patches. I'll let you know once the series is done. Thanks. -- tejun