From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the kgdb tree
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:46:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B66F752.1070001@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100201172952.95fe2150.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c between commit
> 53a2aa296b5108e9bfdcda7f41221e721d9c7474 ("x86,hw_breakpoint,kgdb: kgdb
> to use hw_breakpoint API") from the kgdb tree and commit
> cc0967490c1c3824bc5b75718b6ca8a51d9f2617 ("x86, hw_breakpoints, kgdb: Fix
> kgdb to use hw_breakpoint API") from the tip tree.
>
> These two commits are similar but sufficiently different to make a mess.
> I effectively reverted the kgdb tree version and used the tip tree
> version. This also involved reverting the kgdb tree changes to
> arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c. I hope I got it right (since I had to
> reapply a few other kgdb changes by hand) (an x86_64 allmodconfig build
> produces no new warnings or errors, so I have some hope).
>
> Someone should give me some guidance as to a way forward here, please.
>
>
What is in tip is the correct version.
It is the age old time dependency of who updates whose tree first, vs
when the linux-next merge runs. At any rate this is already resolved.
Thanks,
Jason.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-01 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-01 6:29 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the kgdb tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-01 15:46 ` Jason Wessel [this message]
2010-02-01 23:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-14 4:14 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-14 14:00 ` Don Zickus
2010-01-14 5:13 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-14 9:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-01-14 15:01 ` Jason Wessel
2010-01-14 15:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-01-14 15:49 ` Jason Wessel
2009-10-28 7:04 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B66F752.1070001@windriver.com \
--to=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).