From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: upcoming percpu changes Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:31:20 +0900 Message-ID: <4B6BC948.5030401@kernel.org> References: <20100205161648.086375b9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4B6BB13C.2090108@kernel.org> <20100205070903.GA9320@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:35707 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933310Ab0BEHY5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:24:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100205070903.GA9320@elte.hu> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linus , Andrew Morton , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Rusty Russell , Christoph Lameter , "H. Peter Anvin" , Fr??d??ric Weisbecker Hello, Ingo. On 02/05/2010 04:09 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Has the review feedback from Frederic and hpa been addressed? (and have they > acked the solution?) That was the only controversial bit i remember. Al Viro said that, until sparse is improved, the only solution would be to work around in the rather ugly way as posted in the original patches. As Frederic and hpa preferred not having the workaround and there were only three instances in the kernel tree, I just left them alone so sparse warning will trigger spuriously on those three locations. Thanks. -- tejun