From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: linux-next: add utrace tree Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:09:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4B6FE2E0.6080803@redhat.com> References: <1264575134.4283.1983.camel@laptop> <1264589716.4283.2006.camel@laptop> <20100127110555.GB1842@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100127110555.GB1842@in.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: utrace-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: utrace-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: ananth@in.ibm.com Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Kyle Moffett , Peter Zijlstra , Fr??d??ric Weisbecker , Tom Tromey , Oleg Nesterov , Steven Rostedt , LKML , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , utrace-devel@redhat.com, Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 01/27/2010 01:05 PM, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > We don't need to write one. I don't know how easy it is to make the kvm > emulator less kvm-centric (vcpus, kvm_context, etc). Avi? > It's a lot of mindless work but not too difficult; replacing hardcoded accessors with function pointers. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function