From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the libata tree with Linus' tree Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:45:57 -0400 Message-ID: <4BAEDF05.9070006@garzik.org> References: <20100322124422.4a10bc4a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-yx0-f191.google.com ([209.85.210.191]:65040 "EHLO mail-yx0-f191.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751775Ab0C1EqE (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:46:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100322124422.4a10bc4a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shane Huang , Anton Vorontsov On 03/21/2010 09:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Today's linux-next merge of the libata tree got a conflict in > drivers/ata/ahci.c between commit > 5db5b0215af94a36d4bf10900ff9707b6d5c1610 ("ahci: pp->active_link is not > reliable when FBS is enabled") from Linus' tree and commit > efd7cb719e07433588ee5c6a99b1208b0aff6295 ("ahci: Move generic code into > libahci") from the libata tree. > > I applied the changes to drivers/ata/ahci.c from the former commit to > drivers/ata/libahci.c (where the latter commit moves it). Should be fixed now...