From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] kmemcheck: build failure after merge of the slabh tree Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:00:48 +0900 Message-ID: <4BB0EAD0.2030807@kernel.org> References: <20100329154208.009a8ae2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100329092513.6e6faf2a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100329092513.6e6faf2a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jon Masters List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Hello, On 03/30/2010 01:25 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > This tree seems to be a bit messy. :( Sorry. Most of the failures came from me forgetting to run the conversion script on codes which are in linux-next but not mainline, so all the new codes ended up broken by default. I just sent out patches against trees in linux-next. Once they're in, there shouldn't be many problems. > Sorry if I missed this patch in the (email) storm. > > mm/kmemcheck.c also needs slab.h added to it: But this one is something I missed from the mainline (my script didn't check for isolated SLAB_* flag usages). I'll take this one into the slabh tree. Thanks for reporting this. :-) -- tejun