From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17] input: update gfp/slab.h includes Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:29:19 +0900 Message-ID: <4BB1FCAF.6080409@gmail.com> References: <1269885165-18617-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1269885165-18617-15-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20100330142148.2ac3fc0e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4BB1EBD4.9030707@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:34098 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752621Ab0C3N0W (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:26:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BB1EBD4.9030707@kernel.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov Hello, again. On 03/30/2010 09:17 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Ah, I see. sysrq.c's requirement changed between mainline and > linux-next. I'll update slabh tree such that it includes slab.h from > there. slabh updated such that... * kmemcheck fix patch is placed before the patch to break implicit slab.h inclusion. * sysrq.c now includes slab.h instead of gfp.h. * Updated against the current mainline 9623e5a23724d09283c238960946ec6f65733afe. Conversion script was run again and outputs are compared. No new dependency appeared since the last round. So, it should now be safe to ignore this patch. Thanks. -- tejun