Re: linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>]

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the v4l-dvb tree produced a mountain of
> conflicts so I have used the version from next-20100512 for today.
> Please either merge Linus' tree into yours or rebase you tree on top of
> Linus' tree.  There are a large number of commits that are in your tree
> that have been rebased before being included into Linus' tree and this
> caused conflicts with further changes in your tree.

I'll be pulling from Linus on my tree. I did it yesterday, after my last changes,
but it seems that I've made a huge mistake... Several conflicts that I've already
fixed reappeared. I suspect that I've merged it with an older temporary branch
by mistake.

Anyway, it is fixed, by simply going back to the last reflog before the error,
and re-merging the new patches again. A pull from Linus didn't show any conflict.

So, it should be now OK for you to merge.

> Please consider changing your work flow so that you don't rebase things
> in your tree before sending them to Linus.

I'm already in process of changing my procedure. The problem is that I didn't find
yet a perfect way to handle my tree. I'm getting some new ideas, and intend to implement
them for 2.6.35 development cycle (linux-next for 2.6.36).

-- 

Cheers,
Mauro